Mt etna carbon dating Free private one on one chat with girls
Much later after the Grand canyon was already formed, igneous rocks were formed from a volcano on top of the canyon, that Indians saw erupt, only about 1000 years ago.(The volcano lava flows have Indian artifacts in them, and go over the canyon walls.) These rocks were dated using the same method in the lab and were assigned an age of 1.3 billion years old.These dating methods rely on a series of assumptions about the amounts of the parent-daughter elements, and a constant rate of decay. It has been accepted that a rock is formed when it first cools down from a molten or semi-molten state, which may include a variety of elements, including radioactive ones. For the last 100 years we have been able to measure the decay rate, and during this time it has been very steady, very consistent.
but if its an unknown sample, then they say: “Oh, you can trust the lab dates! You see, the radiometric dating technique’s do not work when you can check the dates, but you should trust them when you can’t check them. RATE found 3 indicators that strongly indicate decay rates changed in the past, all pointing to a young age for the rocks and the earth.A 100 year sample of decay rates is inadequate when talking about millions of years. This is assumed to be immaterial, but can change the end results drastically.We do not know for sure if the rate of decay was the same 1000 years ago, let alone 10,000 years ago, or millions of years ago. Has there been contamination into the rock of either extra amounts of parent or daughter elements? 3) The starting point contains only the parent element.How can the very top, volcanic rock be older than the very bottom layer basalt rock?Even evolutionists admit that those Indian artifacts are not 1.3 billion years old!