Effective range carbon dating dating love rencontre speed
The next step, using the scientific method, would be to come up with an experiment that would elicit a recordable change.In this specific case, try to manipulate the environment around a radioactive element to effect a change in the half-life constant.Grrr Originally posted by Buck G:ps- Side rant from me as a scientist: I find ranty non-scientific curt dismissals of theories with this sort of attitude half baked and highly aggravating.It's like a little kid turning their nose up their parent cause they think they know better. It's even more aggravating when you look at the attitude that it tends to come with: "Well, I have an open mind, unlike you.This calibration is what limits the accuracy because we know that with a given amount of carbon-14, it absolutely will decay at a very tightly controlled rate.100,000 years is out of the question. It can set a frame, or a parameter for the occurence of one event or another, but it has only the most recent reference for the age of any matter whatsoever. We have only arbitrary concepts of the age of matter as we know it. The theory being that once the material (presumably organic) has trapped the 'day zero' carbon-13/-14 mix in it's molecules that mix ratio begins to change.
We can get reasonable accuracy to 50,000 years, better accuracy more recently.If we surmise that the Strong Nuclear Force can change, then we have to explain why the Sun is still there.A bit in one way, the rate of fusion goes through the roof and the Sun blows itself apart.Do you have a testable theory as to why this would not be the case?Science can provide rationale for the dating stated.